Ultra-Large Format Cameras: When 300mm Is a Wide Lens

There’s no real upper limit to how large a camera sensor or film can be. “Full frame” cameras are smaller than medium format digital, which itself falls behind most medium format film – and so on. At the high end of the scale are Ultra-Large Format (ULF) film cameras.

What is an ultra-large format camera? It’s any camera with an imaging area larger than 8×10 inches. In other words, each individual sheet of film – and it is film rather than digital, unless you’re NASA – is substantially larger than a standard sheet of printer paper. Even a basic 1200 PPI scan of ultra-large format film is going to be hundreds of megapixels… not that most scanners can fit such large sheets of film in the first place.

As the name implies, ultra-large format is massive compared to typical 35mm full-frame sensors or even medium format. Relative to the sensors in a phone, the difference is astronomical.

I chose that term – “astronomical” – because comparisons to astronomy are easy to make with cameras this large. For example, here’s the relative size of the Earth versus the Sun:

Earth vs Sun Size To Scale

And here’s the largest sensor on the iPhone 13 Pro Max versus ultra-large format film (16×20, not even the largest standard ULF size):

iPhone Sensor Size vs 16x20 Ultra Large Format Film Camera

Many digital photographers have at least heard of 4×5 or 8×10 film cameras, which are large cameras in their own right. But those aren’t ultra-large format. They’re not big enough. Instead, the usual classification goes like this:

  • Typical digital cameras through 6×9 cm film: Medium format and smaller
  • 4×5 through 8×10 inch film: Large format
  • Anything larger: Ultra-large format (ULF)

These days, the most popular formats of ULF cameras are 11×14, 14×17, 16×20, and 20×24. There are also more panoramic sizes like 7×17, 8×20, and 12×20. (All of those dimensions are the inch measurements of the film for the camera; by comparison, a full-frame sensor is about 1×1.5 inches.)

For many ULF photographers, shooting with this sort of camera is a hobby in and of itself. Think of the differences between off-road Jeepers, vintage car restorationists, and minivan parents. All of them can technically get you from Point A to Point B, but they’re not really after the same things. That said, these cameras all involve photography at the end of the day, and you can get some stunning images from ULF cameras with enough effort.

Here’s what a particularly big ultra-large format camera looks like:

Ultra Large Format Camera

This one, admittedly, is a bit extreme. It’s a 4.5×8 foot camera that was the largest camera in the world in the early 1900s. No surprise, that’s large enough that you’d have to build one from scratch today rather than buying from an established company. But it goes to show that these cameras can be as big as you can build them.

If you’re wondering, there are some working professional photographers who use ultra-large format cameras today (generally not quite 4.5×8 feet) and even a few companies that still make them new. So, I want to push back on the idea that ultra-large format cameras are nothing but antiquated collectibles. Nor are they just “let’s test my woodworking skills” builds. Here and there, a few photographers still put in the extraordinary effort required to use these cameras because the results can be impossible to achieve any other way.

And what results are those? For most photographers, it’s all about contact printing – placing the negative directly on a sheet of light-sensitive paper and getting a one-to-one print. Contact prints are remarkably faithful to the original negative (if you want them to be) and are capable of more detail than just about any other type of print. However, it’s an all-analog process with a lot of hoops to jump through before it turns out right.

Why You Shouldn’t Get an Ultra-Large Format Camera

I know that by writing about ultra-large format cameras on a popular site like Photography Life, I may be tempting some photographers who never even knew such cameras existed to get that twinkle of GAS in their eyes. But to the vast majority of photographers, I urge against buying one. They’re remarkable cameras, but they’re also deeply impractical in almost every way.

If you’re feeling adventurous, there’s a better solution: Go for a large format 4×5 or 8×10 camera instead. Those formats are already slow and difficult to use – easily enough to fill your daily quota of tribulation. But at least they’re nearly reasonable. With 4×5 or 8×10 cameras, you have a good selection of lenses, film, spare parts, and accessories, and you should be able to troubleshoot any problems pretty easily. By comparison, the ultra-large format realm is like pulling teeth from a chicken while simultaneously herding cats.

Ansel Adams with 4x5 Camera
Ansel Adams was smart and used 4×5 or 8×10 for most of his life. 4×5 shown above.

An unavoidable fact of ultra-large format cameras is that they are large and heavy. Take the smaller end of things, for example: 11×14. Typical 11×14 cameras weigh about 20 pounds, not counting at least an additional 3-5 pounds of weight for a lens and a two-shot film holder. Even the lightest 11×14 cameras on the market (aside from rare custom builds) weigh about 13 or 14 pounds, body only.

If you plan to carry such a camera beyond view of your car, good luck finding a backpack that can hold it comfortably – or even fit the camera in the first place. I’ve seen some photographers repurpose cumbersome kayaking backpacks for the job because at least those bags are big enough. Other photographers, even today, carry these cameras on a horse or mule.

Pack Horse
Henry Raschen, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons. California miner.

What ultra-large format lacks in practicality, it makes up for by being fiendishly expensive. Some “alternative” films aren’t so bad – like repurposing x-ray film from the medical industry – but a single 11×14 sheet of a standard B&W film like Ilford FP4+ is about $12. The cost of developing the negative is another few dollars for the chemicals if you do it at home, or $10 at one of the few remaining labs which still develops 11×14. That’s $15-20 per photo! It better be good. (Color film at this size does exist, but only via special order from Kodak or an intermediary, and the minimum order costs about as much as a new car.)

For crying out loud, the Wikipedia page on ultra-large format photography has a dedicated section called “encumbrances.” Beware, beware, when ULF is in the air.

So, I Got One

How could I resist something like that? Meet my new 11×14:

11x14 camera in the field

I’ve been saving for this camera since I first learned about ultra-large format photography several years ago, and it just arrived this week. Yes, it’s difficult to use (to put it mildly) and yes, digital cameras have a million advantages over it. But for a number of reasons (I’ll talk about them in a later article) I couldn’t be happier with this for my landscape photography.

Cumbersome though the 11×14 format is, I’ve done as much as possible to keep my 11×14 setup in the “backpackable” weight range. I sacrificed a bit of stability to go with a lighter 13-pound camera and two relatively compact lenses. I’ll be developing each sheet of black and white film myself to keep costs down.

It’s tricky to find lenses that cover such a large format, especially if you want them to be lightweight and inexpensive. I chose a 305mm lens for my wide-angle, equivalent to about 28mm on a full-frame system. My other lens is 762mm, equivalent to about 75mm. Combined, the two lenses weigh 4.2 pounds / 1.9 kilos, which is as light as I could find for such a setup. I’m not concerned about the gap between these focal lengths but could always add a 450mm or 480mm eventually.

Below is a photo of my 11×14 camera compared to a Nikon Z7 for scale. Next to both of them is the 4×5 camera that I’ve been using as my main landscape photography setup in recent months:

11x14 vs Nikon Z7 vs 4x5
From left to right: 11×14, Nikon Z7, 4×5

You read that right – I’ve moved to large-format 4×5 for my dedicated landscape kit and have been using the Nikon Z7 for all other travel photography needs. The 11×14 camera is for special occasions when I have time to set everything up and wait for the right shot.

I know that Photography Life has an almost exclusively digital audience, which is why I’ve avoided talking about my experiences with large- and ultra-large format film so far. But it’s become such an important part of my photography that I’ll surely write about it some in the future.

In the meantime, I don’t yet have any sample photos from the 11×14 camera to share with you. (I’ve taken a few but am still working on my film development system.) So for now, I’ll leave you with a few previously unpublished images from my 4×5 camera that I took over the past months. These are the same sorts of landscapes that I’m planning to capture with the 11×14 over the next few years – assuming I spend enough time in the gym that I can carry it beyond my car.

4x5 Monochrome American Basin Mountain
Chamonix 4×5; Nikkor 300mm f/9 @ f/25, 2 seconds, Ilford FP4+ 125; No movements; Epson V850 scan
Crater Lake Smoky Sunset 4x5
Chamonix 4×5; Nikkor 90mm f/8 @ f/20, 1 second, Kodak Portra 160; Slight front shift down; Epson V850 scan
Great Sand Dunes Golden Light 4x5
Chamonix 4×5; Rodenstock Sironar N 150mm f/5.6 @ f/32, 1 second, Kodak Portra 160; Front tilt and swing; Epson V850 scan
Yosemite Telephoto Black and White 4x5
Chamonix 4×5; Nikkor 300mm f/9 @ f/20, 1/8 second, Ilford FP4+ 125; Slight front shift up; Epson V850 scan